They say our feet were meant for dirt

the tally so far-

drums - 100% tracked.

bass guitars - 90% tracked.

electric guitars - about 59% tracked, but we’re scheduled to (hopefully) finish them up on thursday.

acoustic guitars - 0% tracked.

vocals - 1% tracked (i did a one-take scratch track to a song, so really 0%).

keys & piano - 0% tracked.

everything else - 0% tracked.

so, daunting but not bad. right on schedule actually. we’ll keep updating those tallies as things progress.

ok, so story time. upon logging into our myspace account recently, i came accross this new sales channel called “snowcap” which displayed itself prominently on our page right below our music player, boasting our entire back catalog on sale for $.99 a song. i thought to myself “oh, one of my bandmates must have gone ahead and set us up with a snowcap account.” in talking with my other bandmates we all discovered that no one in the band had any idea of how it got there. we hadn’t signed up for it. we came to the conclusion that it must have been a move by our friends at the Common Cloud label in an attempt to boost the sales of our older CDs. i gave my friend Jay at CC a call, and asked him if he knew about the snowcap deal. he had never heard of it and had no idea how it got there, but assured me that he was going to look into it.

now, the reason this is all so terribly interesting is because this snowcap storefront is selling an intellectual property that we own and that our label is in charge of distributing, both physically and digitally without anyone’s consent or knowledge. now, i’m sure it’s all legit and on the up and up with some facet of Common Cloud’s online distro, but it got me thinking about this whole internet piracy issue that is so unbelievably convoluted and confusing right now, especially for the bigger artists who are so mercilessly tied to their labels. i don’t have a real formulated opinion yet, other than we should probably embrace the cultural changes that are happening and rejoice in the fact that so many people (50 some million) are now able to instantaneously access and enjoy products that they more than likely wouldn’t seek out, rather than punishing those individuals in the form of lawsuits and fines, merely for loving a product that is being offered to them (albeit in a technically illegally format). in short, i agree with this guy when he says that major labels should get off their high horse, get their heads out of their grumpy, greedy asses and start steering the train or get out of the way. they have to figure out a way to embrace this new medium, rather than lambasting the pioneers and punishing their loyal listeners for (gasp) actively seeking out the product the labels themselves endorse. they still want everybody to play by their rules when they don’t even realize that the game is over.

take this for instance… the leading music retailer in the world is wal-mart. and honestly, i think the reason they can lay claim to that title is because most discerning music lovers (who are looking for culturally inspiring, relevant art rather than mass-entertainment/distraction) know better than to step foot in that store with the intent of purchasing music. not only can they get an entire world of selection online that they can’t find within the confines of a department store, but they know that their money isn’t going through a massive, evil monster of a corporation before their meager fraction of it gets to the artist they are investing in.

let’s be honest… wal-mart depends on customers who are culturally still one step behind. meaning they don’t know any better than to rely on the idea of a pre-selected physical offering of regurgitated major label enertaina-tripe being all that’s out there. that’s not the best that the world has to offer. these are the same people who take take comfort knowing they don’t have to think about when or why their pre-chewed shit meal is going to be lovingly dumped down their collective populous throats (generally speaking). either that or they don’t know that they can actually expect more for themselves and their eyes and ears than what has been over-hyped and uber-advertised to them by the general mass media circus that lives in our airwaves, billboards, newspaper pages and well, everywhere else.

now I’m fully aware that i’m only talking about the greater middle class here. there are many homes in america where a computer is not in the realm of possibility, much less a broadband internet connection capable of allowing a family to digitally acquire their entire library of music. but, really who is wal-mart’s target market? and honestly, this is where our culture is headed, and in turn that’s where wal-mart’s customers are headed. to look the other way and pretend that in a few years our culture will still want to browse through a few hundred pre-selected CDs and call it a day is close minded. it’s like trying to choose your favorite constellation from a one window apartment. and basically the major labels are satisfied with chains like wal-mart being their leading stream of revenue in a dying market, and attacking those who try to establish the next viable market, even when it encompasses the sales of THEIR music. it’s like they’re winning the race by standing at the starting line shooting rounds at the other runners instead of picking up their feet and running themselves. and these are the people whose good graces we as artists are supposed to be aspiring to attain? who cares. let them stand there and die in their old ways. pretty soon the other runners will be out of range.

anyway, all that to say that i think we should probably try and embrace cultural change, especially when the ramifications could be so positive to everyone involved.

it makes me glad we’re not on a big label. i’ve never been comfortable with the idea in it’s entirety. i’m not actually sure what i want to do when it comes time to release this CD. we’ve always said that we’d like some help getting our music into larger markets, but the more i think about it, it seems as though there are already enough DIY channels out there that a band like us could get away with putting out an album completely independently. it’d be hard work, but i’d like to think that we would be able to survive outside the system that’s in place. and not just survive, but thrive. and have it actually mean more, because it was based off of the work of our own hands. it just makes me wonder why everyone fights so hard to be part of a system that really doesn’t care about them at all. and i’m not just talking about the big, evil majors. most of the bigger indie labels seem to have adopted the same lines of thought as the majors. and we’re all rushing headfirst, blindfolded, trying to grab that label prize. do we even know what the prize is?

i think there-in lies a major difference between art and entertainment, artists and entertainers. i have this sinking feeling that that distinction has been lost somewhere in and around my generation and their idea of the “rock star”. most younger musicians/kids on the whole don’t even realize what it is that they think they want, or why the should want it. they just know that they do. and that’s really scary to think that we as artists can be conditioned to want something that we don’t even understand by people who have nothing to do with our art’s existence. music would and will continue to exist without labels and a label contract should not be the end goal for a musician. maybe for an entertainer, but definitely not an artist. and most musicians i know would rather classify themselves as artists. i know i would, regardless of what people think of the music i make. if i made it for them, it wouldn’t be art. it would be entertainment.

not to say entertainment is a bad thing. quite the contrary, really. if you are genuinely entertained by what i make, than “fuckin’ rad,” says i. but does one’s perception of an artistic expression determine its existence, or is it and will it always exist as the creator intended it? damn. philosophy and shit.

i’ve determined by my facebook virtual bookshelf that i need to read more.

-marky

7 Responses to “They say our feet were meant for dirt”

  1. aaron Says:

    “it’s like they’re winning the race by standing at the starting line shooting rounds at the other runners instead of picking up their feet and running themselves.”

    genius. and its all because they can afford the expesive lawyer-guns while the ones they’re shooting at can only manage to scrape up a few spitwads to shoot back.

    i like your idea. ignore em till we’re out of range.

    love it.
    aaron

  2. djabacus Says:

    ok, so snocap seems to be strongarming a portion of myspace-using musicians. mr. the flashbulb himself has a magical surprise snocap widget on his page, and is none too happy about it. http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=94831&blogID=323950887 is a brief account of why he’s more than a bit pissed. basically, the label he was signed to that released said tunage is defunct, and neither the artist nor the perfectly normal human worm babies behind the previously mentioned defunct label are receiving cash monies for the product being sold. it’s curious, to say the least, as to where the cash is flowin’. on a side note, i’m not quite sure as to why i didn’t get assaulted with a snocap trade-yr-dolla-dolla-bill-yall-fer-some-musics device on the dja myspace. possibly the giant creative commons logo, possibly because i’m unmarketable, whatever, this is a discourse for other channels.

    walmart is the nation’s biggest music (et al.) distributor due solely to the fact that they appeal to the lowest common denominator and their lowest common denominational sensibilities. as much as i’d love to, one cannot blame distribution channels for pandering correctly to their target demographic. you know who i blame for this mess? society.

    sycophantically, i truly am genuinely entertained by what you (and yours) create. however, art is purely subjective. the artist will always be able to define their work as they see fit, but that does not ensure that the general populace will follow suit. consider, if you will, pablo picasso’s cubist period. this is generally accepted as Great Art, even to those who do not appreciate more abstract styles. comparitively, jackson pollack’s equally bizarre but far more esotheric works are polarizing; some declare it to be brilliant deviations from the norm, where some don’t understand why that damned child wasn’t scolded for spilling paint all over. it’s purely subjective.

    and so forth.

  3. heather Says:

    you’re brilliant. i wish i had a better response, but we’ve talked about this at length and i’m burning our lunch.

  4. Leryan Says:

    “but does one’s perception of an artistic expression determine its existence, or is it and will it always exist as the creator intended it?”

    Hmm…that is a good question. I’ve asked this question of myself as (with much emphasis) a prospective artist and as a prospetive entertainer. I think both arguments would suffice in any given situation. If anything, that could be the idea of artistic expression: The right to choose your perspective altogether instead of the normal confomity of society. At the least, i think art is yet another idealistic perspective that relies heavily on individuality, which, for a number of reasons, causes me to feel the DIY route is the way to go, instead of the majors taking advantage of art’s ideals. At least that’s how my eyes see it. Maybe art can be considered a creative relation of ’self’ or ’selves’ for the self or selves. In that, ‘i’ can be both artist, entertainer, or both by myself or within a group.

  5. electric guitars for sale Says:

    electric guitars for sale…

    This is similar to comment spam but avoids some of the safeguards designed to stop the latter practice. Six Apart started a working…

  6. altoball torrents Says:

    yo…

    wow…

Leave a Reply